Wp(C)/20868/2013 Of S.soman v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
29 Aug 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/20868/2013 Of S.soman v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
29 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/20868/2013 Of S.soman v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013/7TH BHADRA, 1935
WP(C).No. 20868 of 2013 (G) ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:
----------------
1. S.SOMAN
SREE VALSAM APARTMENTS, PONNOTH ROAD, KOCHI-682 017
2. SHYLAJA SOMAN,
SREE VALSAM APARTMENTS, PONNOTH ROAD, KOCHI-682 017
BY ADVS.SRI.ISSAC M.PERUMPILLIL
SRI.JIJO PAUL KALLOOKKARAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
-------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE, 5TH FLOOR, KANDAN KULATHI TOWERS M G ROAD, KOCHI-682 011 M G ROAD, KOCHI-682 011
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1,
IYYATTIL JUNCTION, CHITTOOR ROAD, COCHIN-682011
3. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER
RANGE 1, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, KOCHI-682 018 CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, KOCHI-682 018
4. THOMAS J VAYALAT
VAYALAT HOUSE, V T J ENCLAVE, NO 6/419 MARADU-682 304 MARADU-682 304
R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-08-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 20868 of 2013 (G) ----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
----------------------------
EXT.P1:-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ATTACHMENT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DTD 13/1/2010RESPONDENT, DTD 13/1/2010
EXT.P2:-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ATTACHMENT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXTENDING EXT.P1 ATTACHMENT FOR A FURTHER PERIOD SIX MONTHS, DTD 1/6/2011RESPONDENT EXTENDING EXT.P1 ATTACHMENT FOR A FURTHER PERIOD SIX MONTHS, DTD 1/6/2011
EXT.P3:-TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIOENR BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 28/9/2011BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 28/9/2011
EXT.P4:-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ATTACHMENT ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, DTD 27/1/2012RESPONDENT, DTD 27/1/2012
EXT.P5:-TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO 16484/2012 , FILED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER DTD 13/8/2012FIRST PETITIONER DTD 13/8/2012
EXT.P6:-TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, AND ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER, DTD 18/1/2013ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER, DTD 18/1/2013
EXT.P7:-TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY/REPRESENTATION OF THE IST PETITIONER INRESPONSE TO THE NOTICE DTD 18/1/2013,OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT,SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT,DTD 6/5/2013RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE DTD 18/1/2013,OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT,SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT,DTD 6/5/2013
EXT.P8:-THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER IN RESPONSE TO EXT P6 NOTICE BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT,DTD 6/5/2013PETITIONER IN RESPONSE TO EXT P6 NOTICE BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT,DTD 6/5/2013
EXT.P9:-TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE IST PETITIONER DTD 2/7/20132/7/2013
EXT.P10:-TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER,DTD 2/7/20132/7/2013
EXT.P11:-THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT, DTD 10/7/2013PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT, DTD 10/7/2013
EXT.P12:-THE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD 10/7/2013PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD 10/7/2013
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
-----------------------------
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
-------------------------------
W.P (C) No.20868 of 2013
-------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of August, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Departmentpoints out that notice under Rule 2 of the II Schedule to theIncome Tax Act were served on the petitioners on 8.12.2011.The petitioners contend that 18 cents in R.S.No.135/7 of MaraduVillage was sold on 28.8.2010 itself and the remaining 43.25cents in the same survey number was only sold on 27.12.2011.
EXT.P12:-THE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD 10/7/2013PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD 10/7/2013
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
-----------------------------
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
-------------------------------
W.P (C) No.20868 of 2013
-------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of August, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Departmentpoints out that notice under Rule 2 of the II Schedule to theIncome Tax Act were served on the petitioners on 8.12.2011.The petitioners contend that 18 cents in R.S.No.135/7 of MaraduVillage was sold on 28.8.2010 itself and the remaining 43.25cents in the same survey number was only sold on 27.12.2011.
2. The petitioners are eager and willing to deposit theentire sale consideration received in discharge of their liabilitytowards income tax. Exts.P7, P8, P11 and P12 representationssubmitted in this regard are pending consideration with the thirdrespondent.
3. I direct the third respondent to consider Exts.P7,
P8, P11 and P12 representations within a period of two months.The petitioners as well as the fourth respondent assignee shallbe put on notice and heard in the exercise.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
V.CHITAMBARESH,Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.