Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/209/2018 Of Smt. Kanakalatha S.pan...

Wp(C)/209/2018 Of Smt. Kanakalatha S.panicker v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 08 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/209/2018 Of Smt. Kanakalatha S.panicker v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
08 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/209/2018 Of Smt. Kanakalatha S.panicker v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 19TH MAGHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 209 of 2018 --------------------- PETITIONERS : ----------- SMT. KANAKALATHA S.PANICKER VASUDEVA VILASAM, KANJIRAMOOD, ARYANAD P.O., TRIVANDRUM - 695 542. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SRI.R.SREEJITH SRI.P.JINISH PAUL KUM.MEKHALA M.BENNY SRI.ASISH MOHAN SRI.G.KRISHNAKUMAR (MALLYA) RESPONDENTS : ----------- 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON SENIOR ADVOCATE BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: bp APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS----------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT RECORDED UNDER SEC.132(4).EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PANCHANAMA.EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.3.2016.EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL TO THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS).EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.EXHIBIT-P6: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :NIL. //TRUE COPY//P.A. TO JUDGE P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.......................................................W.P.(C).No.209 of 2018......................................................Dated this the 8[th] day of February, 2018 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petitionconcerns the inaction on the part of the first respondent inconsidering Ext.P6 application preferred by the petitioner forreturn of the cash seized from her. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioneras also the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, Ideem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directingthe first respondent take a decision on Ext.P6 applicationpreferred by the petitioner, with notice to the petitioner,within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. Ordered accordingly. hmh Sd/-P.B. SURESH KUMARJUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan