Wp(C)/21062/2023 Of Thiroor Kuries Privatye Limited v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/21062/2023 Of Thiroor Kuries Privatye Limited v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/21062/2023 Of Thiroor Kuries Privatye Limited v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 3 DAY OF JULY 2023 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 21062 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
THIROOR KURIES PRIVATYE LIMITED
THIROOR, MULAMKUNNATHUKAVU, TRICHUR REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN SRI.K R RAMACHANDRAN, PIN - 680581
BY ADV ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV
RESPONDENTS:
1ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERINCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER
ASSESSNEBT UNIT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI, PIN - 110003INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, 401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI, PIN - 110003
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NATIONAL FACLESS APPEAL CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI, PIN - 110003
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dated this the 3[rd ] day of July, 2023JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed to direct the second
respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal andExt.P3 stay petition, expeditiously.
2. The petitioner's case is that, aggrieved by Ext.P1
assessment order passed by the first respondent, thepetitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the secondrespondent on 1.4.2023. Along with Ext.P2 appeal, thepetitioner has also filed Ext.P3 stay petition. Thepetitioner’s apprehension is that during the pendency ofthe stay petition, respondents may enforce Ext.P1 order.Hence, the writ petition.
3. Heard; Sri. Alan Priyadarshi Dev, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Jose Joseph,the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. Having considered the pleadings and materials
on record and taking note of the fact that Ext.P3 staypetition is pending consideration before the secondrespondent since 1.4.2023, I deem it appropriate todispose of the writ petition in the following manner:-
(i) The second respondent is directed to considerand dispose of Ext.P3 stay petition, in accordance withlaw and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within aperiod of three months from the date of receipt of acertified copy of the judgment, after affording thepetitioner an opportunity of being heard.
(ii) If the second respondent proposes to pass aconditional order of stay, he shall state reasons for thesame.
(iii) Until such time orders are passed on Ext.P3, all
WP(C) NO. 21062 OF 2023
4
further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 shall standdeferred.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21062/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 13.03.2023
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPYOF MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 01.04.2023
EXHIBIT-P3
TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 01..04.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.