Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/21296/2021 Of Kizhakkedath Enterpr...

Wp(C)/21296/2021 Of Kizhakkedath Enterprises v. Agrl. Income Tax And State Tax Officer

High Court 06 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/21296/2021 Of Kizhakkedath Enterprises v. Agrl. Income Tax And State Tax Officer
Date of order
06 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/21296/2021 Of Kizhakkedath Enterprises v. Agrl. Income Tax And State Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 6 DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 14TH ASWINA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 21296 OF 2021 PETITIONER: M/S.KIZHAKKEDATH ENTERPRISESPAZHAVANGADI.P.O, RANNI-689673, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI.JOMON PHILIP. BY ADVS.SRI.TOMSON T.EMMANUELSRI.BEJOY CHERIYAN RESPONDENTS: 1AGRL. INCOME TAX AND STATE TAX OFFICERSGST DEPARTMENT, RANNI-689673.2DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)SGST DEPARTMENT, PATHANAMTHITTA-689645.3THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXSGST DEPARTMENT, PATHANAMTHITTA-689645. BY DR.THUSHARA JAMES, SR. GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 06.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.21296/21 BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21296 of 2021 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 6[th] day of October, 2021 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2016-17, petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appealbefore the 2[nd] respondent, along with Ext.P3 petition for condoningdelay in filing Ext.P2 appeal. A petition for stay of proceedingspursuant to the assessment order has also been filed as Ext.P4.Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected evenbefore the petition for stay is considered. Hence this writ petition. 2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for thepetitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that this writpetition itself can be disposed of with a direction. 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent toconsider and pass orders on Ext.P3 delay condonation petition aswell as Ext.P4 stay petition, within a period of three months from the W.P.(C) No.21296/21 -:3:- date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- vps BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE W.P.(C) No.21296/21 -:4:- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21296/2021 PETITIONER'S/S' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 26.02.2021COMPLETED U/S.25(1)OF THE KVAT ACT FOR2016-17 BY 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL DATED12/07/2021SUBMITTEDBEFORE2NDRESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1.12/07/2021SUBMITTEDBEFORE2NDRESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF PETITION FOR CONDONINGDELAY SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXT P2APPEAL, BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT.DELAY SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXT P2APPEAL, BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF PETITION FOR STAY SUBMITTEDALONG EXT.P2 APPEAL, BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT.ALONG EXT.P2 APPEAL, BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 11-12-2020IN WP(C)NO.27617 OF 2020 PASSED BY THISHON'BLE COURT IN DIRECTING 1STRESPONDENT TO CONSIDER JUDGMENT PASSEDON SIMILAR ISSUE, WHILE COMPLETINGASSESSMENT.IN WP(C)NO.27617 OF 2020 PASSED BY THISHON'BLE COURT IN DIRECTING 1STRESPONDENT TO CONSIDER JUDGMENT PASSEDON SIMILAR ISSUE, WHILE COMPLETINGASSESSMENT. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 02.12.2015IN WP(C)NO.5077 OF 2009 PASSED BY THISHON'BLE COURT.IN WP(C)NO.5077 OF 2009 PASSED BY THISHON'BLE COURT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan