Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/21734/2008 Of Bindu Krishna Das v....

Wp(C)/21734/2008 Of Bindu Krishna Das v. Agricultural Income Tax & Sales Tax

High Court 22 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/21734/2008 Of Bindu Krishna Das v. Agricultural Income Tax & Sales Tax
Date of order
22 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/21734/2008 Of Bindu Krishna Das v. Agricultural Income Tax & Sales Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Having regard to the facts of thecase, writ petition is disposed of as follows.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2008 / 31ST ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 21734 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BINDU KRISHNA DAS ATHULYA ENTERPRISES, ERIMAYOOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ALATHUR. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR) TALUK OFFICE, ALATHUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 21734 OF 2008 K ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 22[nd] day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders, petitioner preferred Exts.P3 and P4 appeals before the 2[nd]respondent. Case of the petitioner is that Exts.P3 and P4 appealswere heard and orders were awaiting. In the meantime, thepetitioner faced with Exts.P8 and P9 notices under the RevenueRecovery Act. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,submits that the appeals are partly heard and are adjourned forproduction of some documents. Having regard to the facts of thecase, writ petition is disposed of as follows. There will be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to considerand take a decision on Exts.P5 and P6 stay petitions inaccordance with law, within three weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy of this judgment. Till such decision is taken, recoveryproceedings pursuant to Exts.P8 and P9 will be kept in abeyance.Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2[nd]respondent as soon as it is received. aks Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan