Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/2230/2015 Of Sambalpur Development...

Wp(C)/2230/2015 Of Sambalpur Development Authority v. Principal Chief Commissioenr Of Income Tax

High Court 17 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

17 Mar 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/2230/2015 Of Sambalpur Development Authority v. Principal Chief Commissioenr Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 2230 of 2015 ….PetitionerMr. J.M. Pattnaik, Advocate Sambalpur Development Authority -versus- Principal Chief Commissioner of ….Opposite PartiesIncome Tax, Bhubaneswar and Others Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER Order No. 17.03.2022 02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge S.K. Jena/P.A.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.