In Wp(C)/2231/2015 Of Sambalpur Development Authority v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 2231 of 2015
….PetitionerMr. J.M. Pattnaik, Advocate
Sambalpur Development Authority
-versus- Principal Chief Commissioner of ….Opposite PartiesIncome Tax, Bhubaneswar and Others
Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No.
17.03.2022 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the writ petition
02.
has been rendered infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.