Wp(C)/22431/2005 Of Lord Krishna Bank Ltd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Jan 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/22431/2005 Of Lord Krishna Bank Ltd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/22431/2005 Of Lord Krishna Bank Ltd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Liberty is granted and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2010 / 14TH POUSHA 1931
WP(C).No. 22431 of 2005(U)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
LORD KRISHNA BANK LTD.,
INDIAN EXPRESS BUILDING, KALOOR,
KOCHI 682 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MD AND CEO (OFFICIATING) MR. V.K.GUPTA.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE, SENIOR ADVOCATE
SRI.MITHUN MARKOS
RESPONDENTS:
---------------
1. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
KOCHI.
2. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIRCLE (1), RANGE-1,
ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. MR. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT.
ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES)
ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC .
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 04/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
..............................................................................
W.P.(C) No. 22431 OF 2005
.........................................................................
Dated this the 4[th] January, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P5
impugned order was subjected to challenge before the statutoryappellate authority wherein an order was passed in favour ofthe petitioner-Bank. Though the same has been subsequentlytaken up and challenged before the Income Tax Department, itis pending consideration. In the said circumstances, the learnedCounsel submits that the Writ Petition may be permitted to bewithdrawn with liberty to challenge the proceedings as and whennecessitated .
Liberty is granted and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.
lk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.