Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/22431/2005 Of Lord Krishna Bank Lt...

Wp(C)/22431/2005 Of Lord Krishna Bank Ltd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 04 Jan 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/22431/2005 Of Lord Krishna Bank Ltd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/22431/2005 Of Lord Krishna Bank Ltd v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Liberty is granted and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2010 / 14TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 22431 of 2005(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- LORD KRISHNA BANK LTD., INDIAN EXPRESS BUILDING, KALOOR, KOCHI 682 014, REPRESENTED BY ITS MD AND CEO (OFFICIATING) MR. V.K.GUPTA. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.MITHUN MARKOS RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOCHI. 2. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE (1), RANGE-1, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. MR. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT. ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL,GOI(TAXES) ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC . THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 22431 OF 2005 ......................................................................... Dated this the 4[th] January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P5 impugned order was subjected to challenge before the statutoryappellate authority wherein an order was passed in favour ofthe petitioner-Bank. Though the same has been subsequentlytaken up and challenged before the Income Tax Department, itis pending consideration. In the said circumstances, the learnedCounsel submits that the Writ Petition may be permitted to bewithdrawn with liberty to challenge the proceedings as and whennecessitated . Liberty is granted and the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan