Wp(C)/22674/2016 Of Mohammed Niaz v. The Income Tax Officer(Inv)
High Court
07 Jul 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/22674/2016 Of Mohammed Niaz v. The Income Tax Officer(Inv)
Date of order
07 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/22674/2016 Of Mohammed Niaz v. The Income Tax Officer(Inv), the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 22674 of 2016================== Dated this, the 7[th] day of July, 2016 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave towithdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to file a fresh petition.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2016/16TH ASHADHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 22674 of 2016 (H)
---------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
MOHAMMED NIAZ, ZEREENE, EDAPPALLY P.O, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, NEAR AL AMEEN SCHOOL, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 24.
BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INV). 3RD FLOOR, ARYA BHANGI PINNACLE BUILDING, SA ROAD, ELAMKULAM, KOCHI682017.
BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-07-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
===============W.P. (C) No. 22674 of 2016==================
Dated this, the 7[th] day of July, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave towithdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to file a fresh petition.
Rp7/07/2016
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
//True Copy//
P.S to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.