Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/22682/2023 Of Michealle Fatima Nia...

Wp(C)/22682/2023 Of Michealle Fatima Niaz v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -3

High Court 25 Sep 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/22682/2023 Of Michealle Fatima Niaz v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -3
Date of order
25 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/22682/2023 Of Michealle Fatima Niaz v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -3, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to anyremedy that may be available to her under law. sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDGE.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH MONDAY, THE 25 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 3RD ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 22682 OF 2023 PETITIONER: MICHEALLE FATIMA NIAZ,AGED 40 YEARSW./O. LATE. MUHAMMED NIAZ, RESIDING AT ZEREENE, ABAD RESIDENCY, CHERANELLUR ROAD, EDAPALLY, KOCHI, PIN – 682 024.BY ADVS.K.J.ABRAHAMPREMJIT NAGENDRANNIKHIL JOHN RESPONDENTS: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) -3,POORNIMA BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, PANAMPALLY NAGAR, KOCHI, PIN – 682 036.BY ADV JOSE JOSEPH SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.09.2023, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 22682/2023 DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J. --------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 22682 of 2023--------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25[th] day of September, 2023. JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to anyremedy that may be available to her under law. sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDGE. Rv
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan