Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/22807/2018 Of Sfo Technologies (P)...

Wp(C)/22807/2018 Of Sfo Technologies (P) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 16 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/22807/2018 Of Sfo Technologies (P) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2009-10, 2002-03
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/22807/2018 Of Sfo Technologies (P) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY ,THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 25TH KARTHIKA,1940 WP(C).No. 22807 of 2018 PETITIONER/S: SFO TECHNOLOGIES (P) LTDSTONE HOUSE, MARKET ROAD, ALUVA,KERALA - 683 101,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.N.JEHANGIR. BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL D. NAIRKUM.MEKHALA M.BENNYSRI.ACHYUT K PADMARAJSRI.R.SREEJITH RESPONDENT/S: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCORPORATE CIRCLE 2(1), C.R.BUILDING,I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. BY ADVS.SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAXSRI.JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). No. 22807 of 2018 JUDGMENT The petitioner Company filed its returns for the assessmentyear 2015-2016 and later claimed refund. Complaining that theDepartment has not processed the petitioners returns for refund, ithas filed this writ petition. 2.In response to the submissions made by the petitioner'scounsel, the Standing Counsel assures the Court that in three weeks'time, the respondent Department will complete the entire processand refund the amounts due to the petitioner. Recording the Department's undertaking, I close the writpetition. Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE das W.P.(C). No. 22807 of 2018 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1:TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2:TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF TAXABLE INCOME FILED ALONG WITH THERETURN. EXT.P3:TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 4.6.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE DY.COMMISSIONER. EXT.P4:TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 4.6.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. EXT.P5:TRUE COPY OF ORDER UNDER SEC.250 OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 12TH JUNE, 2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan