In Wp(C)/23027/2016 Of Sonu Bhartia@Gupta v. Director Of Income Taxinvestigation, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.23027 of 2016
Smt.Sonu Bhartia@Gupta …. Petitioner Mr. L. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Director of Income Tax (Inv.),
Bhubaneswar and others …Opposite Parties
Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER13.09.2021 4. 1. This Court is informed that not only the assessment order was passed but even an appeal filed against it has been disposed of in the meantime.
Order No.
2. It is agreed by the counsel for the parties that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue