Wp(C)/2344/2008 Of A.k.abdul Latheef v. Agricultual Income Tax & Commercial Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2008 / 28TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2344 of 2008(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ A.K.ABDUL LATHEEF, ATTUCHALIL, KADUVAMOOZHY, ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.MOHAMMED YOUSUF RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. TAHSILDAR (RR), REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICE, PALAI. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, ERATTUPETTA. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 2344 OF 2008 D = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18[th] January, 2008 J U D G M E N T It is submitted by the petitioner that aggrieved by Exts. P5 andP6 assessment orders, Exts. P7 and P9 appeals have been filedalong with Exts. P8 and P10 stay petitions. According to thepetitioner, these appeals are pending consideration of the 4[th]respondent. In the meanwhile, recovery action is being continuedand Exts. P1 to P4 demand notices are referred to in this context. 2. In view of the pendency of the appeals and the staypetitions before the 4[th] respondent as noticed above, I dispose ofthis writ petition directing that the 4[th] respondent shall take up forconsideration Exts. P8 and P10 stay petitions filed along with Exts.P7 and P9 appeals. This the 4[th] respondent shall do asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of productionof a copy of this judgment. In the meantime, further proceedingspursuant to Exts. P1 to P4 will stand deferred for a period of sixweeks. jan/- ANTONY DOMINICJUDGE