Wp(C)/23456/2015 Of M.a.azeez v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
04 Aug 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/23456/2015 Of M.a.azeez v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
04 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/23456/2015 Of M.a.azeez v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above. ln Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937
WP(C).No. 23456 of 2015 (F)
----------------------------
PETITIONER :
---------------------
SHRI. M.A.AZEEZ MAHALI HOUSE, MUTTIKULANGARA, PUTHUPARIYARAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 594.
BY SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN BY ADVS.SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN
RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, PALAKKAD-678 014. WARD-1, PALAKKAD-678 014.
2. TH COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-IV/V 6TH FLOOR, KERA BHAVAN, SRVHS ROAD KOCHI-682 011. 6TH FLOOR, KERA BHAVAN, SRVHS ROAD KOCHI-682 011.
R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI. K.M.V. PANDALAI, SC
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
WP(C).No. 23456 of 2015 (F) ----------------------------------------
APPENDIX
EXT. P3: TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2008-09.
EXT. P4: TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2009-10.EXT. P5: TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DT.19-5-14 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2003-04.EXT. P5: TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DT.19-5-14 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2003-04.EXT. P5(a): TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2007-08.
EXT. P5(b): TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2008-09.
EXT. P5(c): TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2009-10.EXT. P6: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DT.30-7-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2003-04.EXT. P6: TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DT.30-7-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2003-04.
EXT. P6(a): TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2007-08.
EXT. P6(b): TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST. YEAR 2008-09.
EXT. P6(c): TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASST.YEAR 2009-10.EXT. P7: TRUE COPY OF PETITION U/S.220(6) DT. 30-7-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT.EXT. P7: TRUE COPY OF PETITION U/S.220(6) DT. 30-7-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL
---------------------------------------------------------------
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Mn
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
*****************************************************************************
W.P.(C) No.23456 of 2015
******************************************************************************Dated this the 4[th] day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, impugning Exts.P1 to P4assessment orders,filed Ext.P5 series of appeals before the second respondent. Thepetitioner also filed Ext.P6 series of stay applications.
2. Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to consider the stayapplications within a period of three months after issuing notice tothe petitioner. Till the disposal of the stay applications, all recovery
proceedings based on the assessment orders shall be kept inabeyance. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgmentalong with the writ petition before the Appellate Authority.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
ln
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.