Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/23559/2007 Of Kerala State Cashew...

Wp(C)/23559/2007 Of Kerala State Cashew Development Corpn v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors

High Court 22 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/23559/2007 Of Kerala State Cashew Development Corpn v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
22 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/23559/2007 Of Kerala State Cashew Development Corpn v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2007 / 31ST SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 23559 of 2007(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, P.B.NO.13, KOLLAM-1 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGTING DIRECTOR DR.K.A.RETHEESH, CASHEW HOUSE, KOLLAM-1. BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN, SC, KSCDC LTD. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM RANGE, CIRCLE-I, KOLLAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, KOLLAM. 4. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, BEACH ROAD, KOLLAM. 5. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, COMMERCIAL BRANCH, KOLLAM. R1&2 BY SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC R4 BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2007, THE COURT ON 22/08/2007 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... .................................................................... Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2007. JUDGMENT The W.P. is disposed of directing the Tribunal to consider application for stay within six weeks from date of filing the same by the petitioner.The petitioner can move for early hearing of the appeal also before theTribunal. Stay against recovery proceedings will continue for two monthsfrom now. Thereafter recovery will be based on orders issued by theTribunal in the stay application. pms C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan