Wp(C)/23573/2014 Of M.radhakrishnan Nair v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/23573/2014 Of M.radhakrishnan Nair v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/23573/2014 Of M.radhakrishnan Nair v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/12TH BHADRA, 1936
WP(C).No. 23573 of 2014 (V)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
M.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, FLAT NO. 1 A 2, FOUR SQUARE MANOR,HOLY FAITH BUILDING, THRIKAKKARA, KOCHI-682021
BY ADVS.SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS SRI.BINU MATHEW SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL) SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.ISAAC THOMAS SRI.NOBY THOMAS CYRIAC
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3),CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD,KOCHI-682 018
2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),SANJUAN TOWERS, OLD RAILWAY STATION ROAD,KOCHI- 682 018
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX GP SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 23573 of 2014
APPENDIX
EXHIBITS
P1-TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 27.3.2014 PASSED BY R1 UNDERSECTION 143(3)
P2-TRUE COPY OF APPEAL DATED 18.4.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE
R2
P3-TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 18.4.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE R2.
//True Copy//
P.A. To Judge
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C).No. 23573 of 2014
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 3[rd] September, 2014
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed by the 1[st]respondent under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961, against which the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appealalong with Ext.P3 application for stay which are stated to bepending before the 2[nd] respondent.
2. In the above circumstances, it is deemed fit that theappellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent, be directed todispose of Ext.P3 stay application within a period of onemonth from today. It is also directed that in the meanwhile,coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 shall be kept inabeyance and the orders passed on Ext.P3 shall determinethe matter, thereafter.
Writ petition disposed of.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge
Mrcs
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.