Wp(C)/23575/2014 Of Chovva Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kannur
High Court
03 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/23575/2014 Of Chovva Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kannur
Date of order
03 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/23575/2014 Of Chovva Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kannur, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/12TH BHADRA, 1936
WP(C).No. 23575 of 2014 (V)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
CHOVVA CO-OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTD.,CHOVVA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670 006REP. BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE C.V.AJAYAKUMAR
BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KANNUR-670006
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, MANANCHIRA, CALICUT-673001
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 03-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 23575 of 2014
APPENDIX
EXHIBITS
P1-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 13.3.2013 PASSEDBY R1 AND THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2008-09
P2-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.10.2012 PASSEDBY R1 AND THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2009-10
P3-TRUE COPY OF THE ASESSMENT ORDER DATED 4.3.2013 PASSED BYR1 AND THE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2010-11
P4-TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THEPETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT FOR THE AY2008-09
P5-TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL AND THE DELAYCONDONATION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE R2FOR THE AY 2009-10
P6-TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THEPETITIONER SOCIETY BEFORE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11
P7-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERSOCIETY BEFORE R2 FOR THE AY 2008-09
P8-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERSOCIETY BEFORE R2 FOR THE AY 2009-10
P9-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERSOCIETY BEFORE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11
//True Copy//
P.A. To Judge
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 23575 of 2014
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated 3[rd] September, 2014
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Exts.P1 to P3 are the assessment orders passedagainst the petitioner for the years 2008-09, 2009-10 and2010-11. Against these orders, petitioner filed Exs.P4 toP6 statutory appeals along with Exts.P7 to P9 staypetitions. Appeals and stay petitions are stated to bepending before the 3[rd] respondent. In the meanwhile,coercive proceedings have been initiated. It is in thiscontext, the writ petition has been filed.
2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that theappellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, shalldispose of Exts.P7 to P9 stay petitions, within a period ofone month from today and the coercive proceedings be
WP(C).23575/14
stayed until such orders are passed, which orders shall
determine the matter thereafter.
Writ petition disposed of.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge
Mrcs
//True Copy//
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.