Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/23576/2014 Of Kararinakam Service...

Wp(C)/23576/2014 Of Kararinakam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 03 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/23576/2014 Of Kararinakam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/23576/2014 Of Kararinakam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/12TH BHADRA, 1936 WP(C).No. 23576 of 2014 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- KARARINAKAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, KURUVA,KADALAYI (PO), KANNUR-670006REP. BY ITS SECRETARY K.C. CHANDRAN BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KANNUR-670006 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-IMANANCHIRA, CALICUT-673 001 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23576 of 2014 APPENDIX EXHIBITS P1-TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.3.2013 PASSED BY R1 ANDTHE DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE AY 2010-11 P2-TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERSOCIETY BEFORE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11 P3-TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SOCEITYBEFORE R2 FOR THE AY 2010-11 //True Copy// P.A. To Judge K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 23576 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 3[rd] September, 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is the assessment order passed by the 1[st]respondent for the year 2010-11, against which thepetitioner has filed Ext.P2 statutory appeal along withExt.P3 application for stay which are stated to be pendingbefore the 2[nd] respondent. 2. In the circumstances detailed above, it is deemedfit that the appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent, bedirected to dispose of Ext.P3 stay application within aperiod of one month from today. It is also directed that inthe meanwhile, coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1shall be kept in abeyance and the orders passed on Ext.P3shall determine the matter, thereafter. Writ petition disposed of. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan