Wp(C)/23644/2015 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
16 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/23644/2015 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/23644/2015 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the lightof the submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 / 26TH POUSHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 23644 of 2015
----------------------
PETITIONER(S)
--------------
VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.2522, HEAD OFFICE, PEYYAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ANIL KUMAR M.,S/O. MADHANAPPAN NAIR.
BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR SMT.SMITHA BABU
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(4), OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE 2, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,RANGE 2, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, SC.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARDON 16-01-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C).No.23644 of 2015.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 16[th] day of January, 2018
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat the writ petition has become infructuous. In the lightof the submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Kvs/-
// true copy //
PS TO JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.