Wp(C)/23800/2009 Of The Palluruthy Mandalam Service Bank v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
20 Aug 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/23800/2009 Of The Palluruthy Mandalam Service Bank v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/23800/2009 Of The Palluruthy Mandalam Service Bank v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
THURSDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2009 / 29TH SRAVANA 1931
WP(C).No. 23800 of 2009(T)
---------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
THE PALLURUTHY MANDALAM SERVICE
CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.65,
PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-682 006,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS MR.M.M.MONAYE
MR.M.PAUL VARGHESE
MR.M.K.GINASH
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER (CIB), COCHIN,
C.R.BUILDINGS, I.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-18.
2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN,
C.R.BUILDINGS, I.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-18.
R1 TO R2 BY ADV. MR.JOSE JOSEPH, SC IT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
........................................................................
W.P.(C) No. 23800 OF 2009 .........................................................................Dated this the 20[th] August, 2009
J U D G M E N T
The issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely coveredby the decision rendered by this Court vide judgment dated18.08.2009 in W.P.(C) No.22697 of 2009 and connected cases.Hence interference is declined in terms of the aforesaidjudgment.
The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
lk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue