Wp(C)/24007/2021 Of M N Prabhakaran Nair v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/24007/2021 Of M N Prabhakaran Nair v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/24007/2021 Of M N Prabhakaran Nair v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
WP(C) NO. 24007 OF 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 3 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 24007 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
M N PRABHAKARAN NAIRAGED 84 YEARSS/O SANKARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT MOOTHEDATHU HOUSE, 1ST LANE PERUNNINAKULAM, IRUMPANAM P.O, KOCHI-382309.BY ADVS.A.BALAGOPALANA.RAJAGOPALANM.N.MANMADANM.S.IMTHIYAZ AHAMMEDP.SEENAASHER REVI JOB
RESPONDENTS:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER ,NON CORPORATION WARD 2(2), OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682018.2THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) IIG-51, PARAPILLY LN, MANORAMA JUNCTION, GIRI NAGAR,PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682036.3INCOME TAX OFFICERCORPORATE WARD 2(5). OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD,KOCI-682018.
OTHER PRESENT:
SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 03.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 24007 OF 2021
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
................................................
W.P.(C) NO.24007 OF 2021 …........................................
Dated this the 3[rd] day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to
assessment year 2014-15, petitioner has preferred an appeal beforethe 4[th] respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P2. A petitionfor stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessment order has alsobeen filed as Ext.P3. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings tobe effected even before the petition for stay is considered. Hencethis writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for thepetitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that this writpetition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to
consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till
such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings initiated against the
petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
AJM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24007/2021
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1
A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.12.2019 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15.
Exhibit P2
A TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTRONICALLY GENERATED FORM NO.35 OBTAINED ON E-FILING OF THE INCOME TAX APPEAL BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE PERIOD 2014-15.
Exhibit P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DATED 29.01.2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2.
Exhibit P4
LETTER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEARING NO.ITBA/RCV/F/17/2021-22/1036191017(1) DATED 6.10.2021 TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL
AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.