Wp(C)/24874/2021 Of Shri. Kadoor Aliyangat Shihab v. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
11 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/24874/2021 Of Shri. Kadoor Aliyangat Shihab v. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
11 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2017-2018
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/24874/2021 Of Shri. Kadoor Aliyangat Shihab v. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 11 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 24874 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
SHRI. KADOOR ALIYANGAT SHIHAB,AGED 43 YEARSPARTNER, NEW STAR AGENCIES, STAR COMPLEX, KANNUR ROAD, CHALODE, KANNUR 670 595.BY ADVS.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEVV.P.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI 110 001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, NEW DELHI 110 001.ADV.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.11.2021, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
===========================
W.P.(C) No.24874 of 2021
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 11[th] day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order, relating to
assessment year 2017-2018, petitioner has preferredan appeal before the 2[nd] respondent, a copy of whichis produced as Ext.P3. A petition for stay ofproceedings pursuant to the assessment order hasalso been filed as Ext.P4. Petitioner apprehendscoercive proceedings to be effected even before thepetition for stay is considered. Hence, this writpetition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for
the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am ofthe opinion that this writ petition itself can bedisposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]
respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4
stay petition, within a period of three months from
the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
4. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedings
against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P2 demandnotice shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS,
JUDGE
AMV/11/11//2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24874/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED27.09.2021 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 27.09.2021ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2017-18.Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED BYTHE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED21.10.2021.Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED22.10.2021.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.