Wp(C)/25019/2021 Of Money Muttom Finance v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/25019/2021 Of Money Muttom Finance v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/25019/2021 Of Money Muttom Finance v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1943WP(C) NO. 25019 OF 2021PETITIONER:MONEY MUTTOM FINANCEXVII-419, RAJAVALSAM BUILDING,OPP NSS COLLEGE, PANDALAM,PATHANAMTHITTA-689501.REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,SHRI VARUN RAJ PILLAI.BY ADVS.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFFM.H.ASIF ALIDIVYA RAVINDRANRESPONDENTS:1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTER CIRCLCE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN,KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM-691001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-III,28/243,"POORNIMA", PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-682036. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.11.2021, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
===========================
W.P.(C) No.25019 of 2021
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 12[th] day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order, relating toassessment year 2017-2018, petitioner has
preferred an appeal before the 2[nd] respondent, acopy of which is produced as Ext.P2. A petitionfor stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitionerapprehends coercive proceedings to be effectedeven before the petition for stay is considered.Hence, this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel
for the petitioner as well as the respondents, Iam of the opinion that this writ petition itselfcan be disposed of with a direction.am of the opinion that this writ petition itselfcan be disposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]
WP(C) NO. 25019 OF 2021
3
respondent or the competent authority to consider
and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition, within aperiod of three months from the date of receiptof a copy of this judgment.
4. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive
proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to
Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept in
abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS,
JUDGE
AMV/12/11//2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25019/2021
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS
RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS:NIL
//TRUE COPY//PA TO JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 25019 OF 2021
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.