Wp(C)/25060/2021 Of Shubha Kooliyot Valappil v. Income Tax Officer (Ao)
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/25060/2021 Of Shubha Kooliyot Valappil v. Income Tax Officer (Ao)
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/25060/2021 Of Shubha Kooliyot Valappil v. Income Tax Officer (Ao), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 25060 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
Smt. SHUBHA KOOLIYOT VALAPPIL,W/O.CHENOLI PARAPRATH SIVARAJ (DECEASED ASSESSEE), SHIVASAKTHI, P.O.KAKKAD, KANNUR-670 005.
BY ADVS.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)V.P.NARAYANANNISHA JOHN
RESPONDENT/S:
1INCOME TAX OFFICER (AO),WARD 1 & TPS, KANNUR-670 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, NEW DELHI-110 001.
BY ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2018-19, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the 2nd respondent, a copy of which is produced asExt.P2. Petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to theassessment order has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitionerapprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even before thepetition for stay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the
petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion thatthis writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2ndrespondent or the competent authority to consider and passorders on Ext.P3 stay petition, within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a
WP(C) NO. 25060 OF 2021
-3-
decision is taken, all coercive proceedings initiated against thepetitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
uu
12.11.2021
-4-
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25060/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21.09.2021 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2
TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTDATED 01.11.2021.
Exhibit P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.2021.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.