Wp(C)/25118/2021 Of Smart Residency Hotels India Private Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/25118/2021 Of Smart Residency Hotels India Private Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/25118/2021 Of Smart Residency Hotels India Private Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 25118 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
SMART RESIDENCY HOTELS INDIA PRIVATE LTD.XIII-325A, MARATHAKKARA, BYE PASS ROAD, OLLUR (P.O),THRISSUR - 680306, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SHRI ARUN RAJ PILLAI.
BY ADVS.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFFM.H.ASIF ALIDIVYA RAVINDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTER CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM- 691001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III,28/243, "POORNIMA', PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN - 682036.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
---------------------------
WP(C) NO. 25118 OF 2021
---------------------------
Dated this the 12[th] day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to
assessment year 2017-18, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the second respondent, a copy of which is producedas Ext.P2. Petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to theassessment order has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitionerapprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even beforethe petition for stay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
2.Having considered the submissions of the Counselfor the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of theopinion that this writ petition itself can be disposed of with adirection.
3.
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the second
respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 staypetition, within period of three months from the date of
WP(C) NO. 25118 OF 2021
3
receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such decision is
taken, all coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1
assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
AJ/12.11.2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25118/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.09.2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY 2017-18 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE AND COMPUTATION STATEMENT.
Exhibit P2
TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 20.10.2021 FOR AY 2017-18 E-FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3
TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 22.10.2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY 2017-18.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.