Wp(C)/25142/2021 Of Sreevalsom Residency v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/25142/2021 Of Sreevalsom Residency v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/25142/2021 Of Sreevalsom Residency v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 25142 OF 2021
PETITIONER :
SREEVALSOM RESIDENCY,
103A, 103B, 103C, MC ROAD, KALADY,
ERNAKULAM-686 574,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR ARUN RAJ PILLAI.
BY ADVS.
S.MUHAMMED HANEEFFDIVYA RAVINDRANT.SAILESH KUMAR
RESPONDENTS :
1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTER CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM - 691 001.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III,
28/243, POORNIMA, PANAMPILLY NAGAR,
COCHIN-682 036.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 25142 OF 2021
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 25142 of 2021
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 12[th] day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2015-16, petitioner has preferred an appeal before the 2[nd]respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P2. A petition for stay ofproceedings pursuant to the assessment order has also been filed asExt.P3. Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effected evenbefore the petition for stay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for thepetitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion that this writpetition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd] respondent
or the competent authority to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 staypetition, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive proceedingsagainst the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
RKM
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 25142 OF 2021
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1 :COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.09.2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY-2015-16 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE AND COMPUTATION STATEMENT.THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR AY-2015-16 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE AND COMPUTATION STATEMENT.
P2 :COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 20.10.2021 FOR AY-2015-16, E-FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.AY-2015-16, E-FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P3 :COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 22.10.2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY-2015-16PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AY-2015-16
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.