In W.p.(C)/2515/2016 Of Luxottica India Eyewear Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the application also standsdismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~5
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P. (C) No. 2515/2016 & C.M. No. 10753/2016 (stay)LUXOTTICA INDIA EYEWEAR PVT. LTD...... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Parth, Advocate.
versus
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... RespondentThrough:Mr.RahulChaudhary,SeniorStanding Counsel with Mr. SanjayKumar, Advocate.
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHARJUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R%13.09.2017
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition inview of the subsequent developments.
2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the application also standsdismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2017dk
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.