Wp(C)/25400/2013 Of Kancor Ingredients Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/26TH ASWINA, 1935 WP(C).No. 25400 of 2013 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- KANCOR INGREDIENTS LIMITED, KANAKKANKADAVU ROAD, ANGAMALY SOUTH -683573 REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCIAL CONTROLLER, MR. RAHUL J. LALKA BY ADVS.SRI.JOSEPH MARKOS(SR.) SRI.V.ABRAHAM MARKOS SRI.BINU MATHEW SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL) SRI.ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.ABRAHAM VARGHESE THARAKAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -1(2) , KOCHI-682018 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) ERNAKULAM -682018 R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-10-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P4COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 12-4-2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER EXT.P5COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 30-1-2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P2 ASSESSMENT ORDER EXT.P6COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 24-1-2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P3 ASSESSMENT ORDER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.P3 ASSESSMENT ORDER EXT.P7COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 12-4-2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE the 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH EXT.P4 APPEAL PETITIONER BEFORE the 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH EXT.P4 APPEAL EXT.P8COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 21-3-2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE the 2ND RESPONDENT PETITIONER BEFORE the 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P9COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 9-10-2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE the 2ND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE the 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE V.CHITAMBARESH,J. = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C)No.25400 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 18[th] day of October, 2013 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed Exts.P4,P5 and P6 appealsagainst Exts.P1,P2 and P3 orders of assessment. The appealsare accompanied by Ext.P7,P8 and P9 petitions for stay ofrecovery of the disputed tax. The petitioner is apprehensive ofcoercive steps even before the disposal of the appeals and thepetitions for stay. 2. I direct the second respondent to consider Exts.P7,P8and P9 petitions with notice to the petitioner within a periodof one month. The coercive steps pursuant to Exts.P1,P2 andP3 orders shall be put on hold in the meanwhile. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writpetition with the judgment before the second respondent forcompliance. The writ petition is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESHJUDGE