Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/25441/2011 Of Sushila Sunny v. Chi...

Wp(C)/25441/2011 Of Sushila Sunny v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 03 Nov 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

03 Nov 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp(C)/25441/2011 Of Sushila Sunny v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

WP(C) NO. 25441 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1944WP(C) NO. 25441 OF 2011 PETITIONER/S: SUSHILA SUNNYCHIRAKKAL HOUSE, XL/676, CHITTUR ROAD,, KOCHI-682 011.BY ADV SRI.S.VIJAYAN NAYAR RESPONDENT/S: 1CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOCHI,, C.R.BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD,, KOCHI-682 018.2DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 2(1), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018.BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 25441 of 2011-------------------------------------- Dated this the 3[rd] day of November, 2022 JUDGMENT When this writ petition came up for consideration on2.11.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner.Therefore, the case was posted today. Today also, there is norepresentation. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- SKS P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.