Wp(C)/25489/2015 Of M/S.time Ads And Publicity v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
20 Aug 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/25489/2015 Of M/S.time Ads And Publicity v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
2012-13, 2012-2013
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/25489/2015 Of M/S.time Ads And Publicity v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937
WP(C).No. 25489 of 2015 (I)
----------------------------
PETITIONER :-----------------------
M/S.TIME ADS & PUBLICITY,
PARAMMEL HOUSE, SHENOY ROAD, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KOCHI-682 017, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, P.A.SEBASTIAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.ANISON
SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI SMT.P.A.RINUSA SMT.ANNIE JACOB
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL), REVENUE BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-682 018 (CENTRAL), REVENUE BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-682 018
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) -II, KERALA BHAVAN, ERNAKULAM SOUTH, KOCHI-682 016. KERALA BHAVAN, ERNAKULAM SOUTH, KOCHI-682 016.
3. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 (2), 405, 4TH FLOOR, C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018 405, 4TH FLOOR, C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-682 018
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).NO.25489/2015
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE LEDGER SHOWING THE PERSONAL INCOME OF MR.P.A.SEBASTIAN FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13.INCOME OF MR.P.A.SEBASTIAN FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13.
P2COPY OF THE INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT ORDER OF MR.P.A.SEBASTIAN FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13
P3COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE LEDGER SHOWING THE CASH TRANSACTIONS BY THE PETITIONER CONCERN DURING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013.TRANSACTIONS BY THE PETITIONER CONCERN DURING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013.
P4COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 DATED 25/3/2015DATED 25/3/2015
P5COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 28/03/2015
P6COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
*****************************************************************************
W.P.(C) No.25489 of 2015******************************************************************************Dated this the 20[th] day of August, 2015
******************************************************************************
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, as against Ext.P4 assessment order, haspreferred an appeal along with stay application before the secondrespondent. The petitioner has approached this Court alleging thatrecovery proceedings are initiated to recover the amount.
2.The learned standing counsel appearing for the Bankrefuted the allegation of the petitioner and submits that no recoveryhas been initiated sofar and Ext.P5 is only a notice of demandunder Section 156 of the Income Tax Act.
Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be adirection to the second respondent to consider the stay applicationwithin three months. Till the disposal of the stay application,recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner shall bedeferred. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of thisjudgment along with the writ petition before the second respondent.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.