Wp(C)/25515/2011 Of John Behnan v. The Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax
High Court
26 Sep 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/25515/2011 Of John Behnan v. The Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax
Date of order
26 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/25515/2011 Of John Behnan v. The Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
MONDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 4TH ASWINA 1933
WP(C).No. 25515 of 2011(L)
----------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
JOHN BEHNAN,M/S.DES INTERNATIONAL,PADOOR PO, KAVASSERY,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR,
SMT.K.HYMAVATHY.
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------
1.AGRICULTURAL INCOME TX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,COMMERCIAL TAXES, ALATHUR - 678 541.
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,ERNAKULAM - 682 015.
3.THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), ALATHUR - 678 541.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K.GOVINDAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 26/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Kss
WPC.NO.25515/2011 L
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1:COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2010-11 DTD. 24/06/2011.
P2:COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DTD. 27/07/2011.
P3:COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 27/07/2011.
P4:COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2010-11 DTD. 18/08/2011.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:N I L
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
-------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 25515 OF 2011
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 26[th] day of September, 2011
JUDGMENT
Against Ext.P1 penalty order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2appeal along with Ext.P3 stay petition. The petitioner’s grievancein this writ petition is that while the stay petition is pending,revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated by the 1[st]respondent to recover the tax disputed in the appeal.
2.I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of thiswrit petition with a direction to the 2[nd] respondent appellateauthority to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition, asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till orders are passedon Ext.P3 stay petition, coercive recovery of the penalty disputedin Ext.P2 appeal shall be kept in abeyance.
acd
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.