Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/25693/2021 Of V.a.joseph v. The Co...

Wp(C)/25693/2021 Of V.a.joseph v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 18 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/25693/2021 Of V.a.joseph v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
18 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/25693/2021 Of V.a.joseph v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 18 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 25693 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: V.A.JOSEPHAGED 54 YEARSS/O ANTONY, 49/1701, VADAKKATH HOUSE, ELAMAKARA P.O.PENEKKARAPEELIKADU, COCHIN-682 016 BY ADVS.LEEJOY MATHEW.V.RAKESH LEO RESPONDENT/S: 1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXOFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CR BUILDING, IS PRESS ROAD, COCHIN-682 018 2THE ASSESSING OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME-TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTREDELHI-1110 001 3THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 001 OTHER PRESENT: SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. =============================== W.P.(C)No.25693 of 2021 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18[th] day of November, 2021 JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred an appeal against the Income taxAssessment for the year 2018-19. Along with the appeal, petitioner has alsopreferred an application for stay as per Exts.P3 and P3 (a). 2.Having regard to the contentions raised, I am of the view that thiswrit petition can be disposed of directing the 3[rd] respondent to consider andpass appropriate orders on the stay petition within a period of three monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till then, all coerciveproceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 Assessment order shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/ BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE jm/ APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25693/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 143(30 R/W 144B DATED 22.4.2021 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE U/S 274/R/W 270A DATED 22.4.2021 Exhibit P3 & P3(A)A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORETHE 3RD RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF STAY APPLICATION Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF DEMAND DATED 11.11.2021
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan