Case Law › High Court › Wp(C)/2579/2016 Of Vigyan Bharati Charit...

Wp(C)/2579/2016 Of Vigyan Bharati Charitable Trust v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 18 May 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

18 May 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/2579/2016 Of Vigyan Bharati Charitable Trust v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 12 case law →

Misc. Case No.11784 of 2016 09.08.2016 This misc. case has been filed by the petitioner for modification of order dated 18.5.2016 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.2579 of 2016. Heard Mr. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Acharya, learned Sr. Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. Considering the submissions made and grounds taken in the misc. case, prayer as made herein is allowed. The order dated 18.5.2016 stands modified directing opposite party No.3 instead of opposite party No.2 to dispose of the application for registration under Section 12-AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 within a period of two months from today. Misc. Case is disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of this order on proper application. Free copy of this order be handed over to the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. I. Mahanty, J. . Biswajit Mohanty, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.