Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/26086/2020 Of V.s.ramakrishnan v....

Wp(C)/26086/2020 Of V.s.ramakrishnan v. Director General Income Tax (Investigation)

High Court 26 Nov 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/26086/2020 Of V.s.ramakrishnan v. Director General Income Tax (Investigation)
Date of order
26 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/26086/2020 Of V.s.ramakrishnan v. Director General Income Tax (Investigation), the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.26086 OF 2020(I) PETITIONER/S: V.S.RAMAKRISHNANAGED 73 YEARSS/O. SANKUNNY, MANAGING PARTNER, RAJESWARI GLASSWARES, DOOR NO. 33/1343, CHALIKKAVATTOM, VENNALAP.O. KOCHI 682 028. BY ADVS.SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOYSRI.E.S.SANEEJSRI.M.P.UNNIKRISHNANSMT.M.K.SAMYUKTHASRI.N.ABHILASHSHRI.DEEPU RAJAGOPAL RESPONDENT/S: 1DIRECTOR GENERAL INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION)INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM 682 030.2PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 682 018.3JOINT COMMISSIONER,INCOME TAX, DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM 682 020.4INCOME TAX OFFICER,INCOME TAX, DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM 682 020. OTHER PRESENT: SC JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON26.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 representation before the 1strespondent seeking a release of articles that have been seized from him inconnection with an investigation. The limited prayer is for a direction to the 1strespondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation, expeditiously,after hearing the petitioner. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also thelearned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also thesubmissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition by directing the 1strespondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation within a periodof three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitionershall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment,before the 1st respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE SJ 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF EXPLANATION LETTER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 13.11.2020.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan