Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/26256/2020 Of Varun Raj Pillai v....

Wp(C)/26256/2020 Of Varun Raj Pillai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Nov 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/26256/2020 Of Varun Raj Pillai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/26256/2020 Of Varun Raj Pillai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942WP(C).No.26256 OF 2020(F) PETITIONER/S: VARUN RAJ PILLAIAGED 32 YEARS S/O. M. K. RAJENDRAN PILLAI, RAJAVALSAM, PANANGADU, P. O. KULANADA, PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689501. BY ADVS.SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFFSMT.DIVYA RAVINDRANSRI.M.H.ASIF ALI RESPONDENT/S: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTER CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KARBALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM - 691001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III28/243, 'POORNIMA', PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN - 682036. 3THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER (CENTRAL)INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KOCHI - 682 018. OTHER PRESENT: SC: SRI.JOSE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON27.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1 to P7 assessment orders under the Income Tax Act, thepetitioner has preferred Exts.P8 to P14 appeals together with Exts.P8(a) to P14(a)stay petitions before the 2[nd] respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that evenprior to considering the stay petition, recovery steps are taken by the respondentsagainst the petitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed by P1 to P7assessment orders. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and alsothe learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also thesubmissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the followingdirections: 1. The 2[nd] respondent shall consider and pass reasonedorders on Exts.P8(a) to P14(a) stay petitions within a periodof three months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment, after hearing the petitioner. 2. Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed againstthe petitioner by Exts.P1 to P7 assessment orders shall bekept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the2[nd] respondent as directed above and communicated to thepetitioner. sd 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petitiontogether with a copy of this judgment, before the 2[nd]respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan