Case Law › High Court › Wpc/2635/2012 Of M/S Anjaniputra Ispat L...

Wpc/2635/2012 Of M/S Anjaniputra Ispat Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Taxcen

High Court 14 Sep 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jhar_pg

Parties

Date of order

14 Sep 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wpc/2635/2012 Of M/S Anjaniputra Ispat Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Taxcen, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Therefore, this writ petition is also dismissed without any observation on themerit.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Sudhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 2635 of 2012 M/s Anjaniputra Ispat ltd. ... ... Petitioner Vrs. Union of India through its Secretary and others ......Respondents ------ CORAM:HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner:M/s Rajiv RanjanFor the Respondents:Mr. Deepak Roshan, Sr. S.C.(I.T.) Ms. Rupa Kumari, Adv. ------ Dated 14th September 2012. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that similar writ petition being W.P. (T) No. 810 of 2012 has already been dismissed by this Court without any observation on the merit. Therefore, this writ petition is also dismissed without any observation on themerit. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.