Case LawHigh Court › W.p.(C)/2672/2013 Of Pepsi Foods Ltd v....

W.p.(C)/2672/2013 Of Pepsi Foods Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr

High Court 26 Apr 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
W.p.(C)/2672/2013 Of Pepsi Foods Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
26 Apr 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In W.p.(C)/2672/2013 Of Pepsi Foods Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: We direct that the stay applications be disposed of by the Tribunal as expeditiously as possible and preferably within three weeks.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(D * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2672/2013 & CM 5050/2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER o/o 26.04.2013 CMs 505112013 & 5058/2013 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2672/2013 & CM 5050/2013 & W.P.(C) 2674/2013 & CMs 5057/2013 These writ petitions are directed against the common notice under Section 221 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 15.04.2013 pertaining to, inter alia, the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. It is an admitted position that appeals of the petitioner as well as stay applications are pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. Earlier the appeals and stay applications were before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench. However, during Signature Not Verified • the pendency. of the said appeals, the matter was transferred to the New Delhi Bench. The assessment proceedings were also transferred to the Assessing Officer (Central Circle-12, New Delhi). We have heard the counsel for the parties. We feel that the writ petitions can be disposed of by directing that the respondent shall not take any coercive steps pursuant to the impugned notice till the Tribunal disposes of the stay applications filed by the petitioner in the appeals pertaining to the said assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. The counsel for the parties agree that a direction be given to the Tribunal for expediting the hearing of the stay applications. We direct that the stay applications be disposed of by the Tribunal as expeditiously as possible and preferably within three weeks. These writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J APRIL 26,2013 rk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan