Wp(C)/26731/2021 Of Foschia Resorts Pvt. Ltd v. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
26 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/26731/2021 Of Foschia Resorts Pvt. Ltd v. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
26 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/26731/2021 Of Foschia Resorts Pvt. Ltd v. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 26 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 26731 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
FOSCHIA RESORTS PVT. LTD.X33/1710E,CHAKKARAPARAMBU, KANIAPILLY ROAD, VENNALA P.O, ERNAKULAM-682028, KERALA, PAN , REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.SHOJAN KOKKADAN RAPPAI.BY ADVS.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.)V.ABRAHAM MARKOSABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS
ISAAC THOMASSHARAD JOSEPH KODANTHARA
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI-11001.2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, NEW DELHI-110001.3INCOME TAX OFFICERCORPORATE WARD 1(1) KOCHI-682018.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH,SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON26.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
===============================
W.P.(C)No.26731 of 2021
-----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 26[th ]day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating to
assessment year 2018-19, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the 2[nd] respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P2.A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitioner apprehendscoercive proceedings to be effected even before the petition forstay is considered. Hence this writ petition.
2.
Having considered the submissions of the counsel for
the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinion thatthis writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction.
3.Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]
respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3stay petition, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a coy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of
hearing to the petitioner. Till such a decision is taken, all coercive
proceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
jm/
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1
Exhibit P2
Exhibit P3
Exhibit P4
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26731/2021
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 20.04.2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 17.05.2021 FILED BYTHE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 14.05.2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTALONG WITH EXT.P2 APPEAL.
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 18.11.2021 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.