Wp(C)/26869/2022 Of J And J Associates v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
22 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/26869/2022 Of J And J Associates v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
2007-08, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2013-14, 2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/26869/2022 Of J And J Associates v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 22 DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1944WP(C) NO. 26869 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
J AND J ASSOCIATESVANACHIRAKKAL HOUSE, THENGODE P.O, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, PIN - 682021BY ADV M.S.AMAL DHARSAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD - 2(1), KOCHI, PIN - 6820162THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE -2(2), KOCHI, PIN – 682016
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON22.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that certain TDS deducted in the nameof the managing partner of the petitioner firm has not been given credit to inthe name of the firm. It is submitted that initially, some of the worksundertaken by the petitioner firm were executed in the name of the managingpartner Mr.V.K. Viju and while making payments, the Governmentdepartment, for which the work was done, had deducted tax and paid it to thecredit of the managing partner.
2. When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learnedStanding Counsel for the department points out the provisions of Rule 37BA ofthe Income Tax Rules and states that on the procedure contemplated therein insub-rule (2) of Rule 37BA being complied with, the credit can be transferred.He submits that on a request being made, a link can be provided for enablingcompliance with the procedure contemplated by sub-rule(2) of Rule 37BA ofthe Income Tax Rules.
3. Taking note of the above submission, this writ petition will standdisposed of directing that on a proper application being made, the Income Taxdepartment will provide a link for uploading the documents necessary fortransfer of credit of TDS from the managing partner of the petitioner firm tothe account of the firm, subject to compliance with all procedural formalities.Proceedings, if any, initiated against the petitioner for recovery of amounts dueunder Ext.P1 order of assessment shall be kept in abeyance for a period of two
months to enable the petitioner to avail the option under Rule 37BA(2) of the
Income Tax Rules.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
okb/
GOPINATH P.JUDGE
//True copy// P.S. to Judge
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26869/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ITR V FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE ITR V FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE ITR V FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE ITR V FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ITR V FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16 Exhibit P6TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01/07/2022 INWPC 6806/2022Exhibit P7TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 01/08/2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.