Wp(C)/27336/2019 Of The Kalliad Service Co-Operative Bank F-1281 v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
15 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/27336/2019 Of The Kalliad Service Co-Operative Bank F-1281 v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
15 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/27336/2019 Of The Kalliad Service Co-Operative Bank F-1281 v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019/23RD ASWINA, 1941
W.P(C).No.27336 OF 2019
PETITIONER:
THE KALLIAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK F-1281KALLIAD P.O, KANNUR-670593, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SAJITHAKUMARI.
SRI.S.ARUN RAJSMT.C.T.SUJA
RESPONDENTS:
BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 15.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Against Ext.P1 assessment order under the Income Tax Act,for the assessment year 2015-16, the petitioner has preferredExt.P2 appeal together with Ext.P3 stay petition before the 3[rd]respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that even prior toconsidering the stay petition, recovery steps are taken by therespondents against the petitioner for recovery of the amountsconfirmed by Ext.P1 assessment order.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner and also the learned Standing counsel appearing for therespondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the caseas also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writpetition with the following directions:
1. The 3[rd] respondent shall consider and passreasoned orders on Ext.P3 stay petition within aperiod of two months from the date of receipt of
prp/15/10/19
a copy of this judgment, after hearing thepetitioner.
2. Recovery steps for recovery of amountsconfirmed against the petitioner by Ext.P1assessment order shall be kept in abeyance tillsuch time as orders are passed by the 3[rd]respondentasdirectedaboveandcommunicated to the petitioner.
3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of thewrit petition together with a copy of thisjudgment, before the 3[rd] respondent, for furtheraction.
Sd/-A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
W.P.(C).No.27336/2019 : 4 :
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDERDATED 25.12.2017 PASSED BY THE ISTRESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THEACT FOR THE AY 2015-16.DATED 25.12.2017 PASSED BY THE ISTRESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THEACT FOR THE AY 2015-16.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COY OF THE FIRST APPEAL FILED BYTHE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RDRESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2015-16.THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RDRESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2015-16.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF STAYFILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RDRESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2015-16.FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RDRESPONDENT FOR THE AY 2015-16.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.