Wp(C)/27623/2024 Of Shaji Ayyappan v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
05 Aug 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/27623/2024 Of Shaji Ayyappan v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
05 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp(C)/27623/2024 Of Shaji Ayyappan v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 5 DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 27623 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
SHAJI AYYAPPAN,AGED 52 YEARS
VILLA NO.2, MISTIC BELLS, NEAR KANIYAMPUZHA BRIDGE, EROOR P.O.,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682306
BY ADVS.K.KRISHNAACHYUTH MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, CORPORATE WARD-2 (2),
I.S. PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682018
2NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,
DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(APPEALS), PIN - 110001
3INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,1ST FLOOR, BLOCK C-I & C-II, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, KOCHI, 1ST FLOOR, BLOCK C-I & C-II, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, KOCHI,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 682037
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC, IT DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
05.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner suffered an order of assessment for the
assessment year 2015-16 under the provisions of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).The petitioner filed an appeal against Ext.P1 order ofassessment, which was dismissed by Ext.P2 order. Thepetitioner is now before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunalby filing a Second Appeal, which is stated to be pendingconsideration of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal alongwith a stay petition (Ext.P5) and an application forcondonation of delay (Ext.P4). The petitioner apprehendsthat recovery proceedings may be initiated to recover theamounts assessed as due, pending consideration of thematter by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that, pending consideration of the stay petition andthe application for condonation of delay, the recoveryproceedings may be kept in abeyance.
WP(C) NO. 27623 OF 2024 3
3.Heard the learned Senior Standing Counselappearing for the Department also.
4.Having heard the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counselappearing for the Income Tax Department and consideringthe limited nature of relief now sought for by the petitioner,this writ petition will stand disposed of, directing theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kochi Bench (the 3[rd]respondent herein) to consider and pass orders on the delaypetition and also on the stay petition filed in Ext.P3 appeal,after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,within a period of three months from the date of receipt of acertified copy of this judgment. Till such time as orders arepassed as directed above, any proceeding for recovery ofany amount assessed as due from the petitioner for theassessment year 2015-16 shall remain suspended. It ismade clear that the Tribunal needs to pass orders on theapplication for stay on merits only if it decides to condonethe delay in filing the appeal. It is also made clear that, it
WP(C) NO. 27623 OF 2024 4
will be open to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal toconsider the issue of maintainability of the stay petition onaccount of the failure to make a pre-deposit ascontemplated by the Proviso to Sub Section (2A) of Section254 of the Act.
ajt
Sd/-GOPINATH P.JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 27623 OF 2024 5
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27623/2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.