Wp(C)/27656/2015 Of V.vijayakumar v. The Director General Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2017/22ND CHAITHRA, 1939 WP(C).No. 27656 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- V.VIJAYAKUMAR S/O. APPU NAIR, RESIDIG AT ANUGRAHAM, PUTHUPARIYARAM, PALAKKAD - 678 731. BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION WING), ARYABHANGHI, PINNACLE, SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN ROAD, KOCHI - 682 020. AYYAPPAN ROAD, KOCHI - 682 020. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, INVESTIGATION WING, MANJAKULAM, NEAR KSRTC, PALAKKAD - 678 001. INVESTIGATION WING, MANJAKULAM, NEAR KSRTC, PALAKKAD - 678 001. 3. MOHAMMED BABU PARAMBOOR, DIRECTOR, M/S. ORBIT INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPERS (INDIA) LIMITED, S/O. MOHAMMED, ALI PARAMBOOR,PARAMBOOR HOUSE, PATTIKAD, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679 325. PATTIKAD, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679 325. R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BY SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON12-04-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 27656 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS----------------------- EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 05/09/2014 FILED BY THE 3RDRESPONDENT BEFORE THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF. EXHIBIT-P2-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08/07/2015 SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL----------------------- TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - W.P(C) No. 27656 of 2015 F- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- Dated this the 12[th] day of April, 2017 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved with thenon-consideration of representation at Ext.P2. Thepetitioner is concerned with a complaint filed by the 3[rd]respondent as to the petitioner having cheated the 3[rd]respondent of Rs.45 crores. The petitioner hence filed anapplication before the 1[st] respondent pointing out that insuch circumstances necessary proceedings be issuedagainst the 3[rd] respondent to reveal the source of Rs.45crores. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondentsubmits that the complaint has been taken cognizance ofand investigation is being carried out. WP(C) No.27656/2015 In such circumstances, the writ petition would stand closed. Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)jma //true copy// P.A to Judge P. A to Judge