In Wp(C)/28205/2023 Of Ajaj Ahamad v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 3, Rourkela, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28205 of 2023
….
Ajaj Ahamad
Petitioner
Mr.Saswat Kumar Acharya, Advocate-versus- ….Income Tax Officer, Ward No.3 Opposite partiesRourkela
Mr.Sidharth Sankar MohapatraSenior Standing Counsel(Income Tax)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI MR JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER15.09.2023 Order No.01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition in order to file better petition with better particulars. 3. In view of such submission, the writ petition is
Order No.
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr.S.K.Panigrahi)
Judge
(G.Satapathy)
Judge
Lingaraj
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: LINGARAJ BEHERADesignation: Sr. StenographerReason: AuthenticationLocation: Orissa High Court,CuttackDate: 18-Sep-2023 11:16:49
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue