Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/28231/2019 Of K.g.jijo v. Director...

Wp(C)/28231/2019 Of K.g.jijo v. Director Of Income Tax(Investigation)

High Court 18 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/28231/2019 Of K.g.jijo v. Director Of Income Tax(Investigation)
Date of order
18 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/28231/2019 Of K.g.jijo v. Director Of Income Tax(Investigation), the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1941 WP(C).No.28231 OF 2019(D) PETITIONER: K.G.JIJOAGED 50 YEARSKOCHUPURACKAL HOUSE, MUDAVOOR P.O., VAZHAPPALLY, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADVS.SRI.DEEPU THANKANSMT.UMMUL FIDASMT.LAKSHMI SREEDHAR RESPONDENTS: THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, whose residential and business premises weresubjected to a search by the Income Tax Authorities, has approached thisCourt seeking a release of an amount of Rs.90,00,000/- that was seizedby the 1[st] respondent in cash from the premises of the petitioner. It isthe case of the petitioner that he is willing to furnish an unconditionaland irrevocable bank guarantee for the said sum, which should sufficefor the purposes of the respondents, while releasing the cash to thepetitioner. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerand also the learned Standing counsel appearing for the Income TaxAuthority. 3. The learned Standing counsel for the Income Tax departmentSri.Jose Joseph, would submit that the assessment proceedings, pursuantto the search conducted, will be completed by the respondents by March2020. It is his submission, however, that if the petitioner agrees for theencashment of the bank guarantee by the department, in the event ofamounts being found due from him by way of incometax/penalty/interest, then the cash can be released against such a bankguarantee. On a consideration of the rival submission, I dispose the WritPetition by directing that, if the petitioner furnishes a bank guarantee in an amount of Rs.90,00,000/- in favour of the 1[st] respondent, on theunderstanding that in the event of the said amounts becoming duepursuant to the assessment order, the bank guarantee can be encashedby the respondents, the respondents will release the cash amount ofRs.90,00,000/- against the unconditional and irrevocable bank guaranteeto be furnished by the petitioner. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan