Wp(C)/28880/2011 Of O.g.sunil v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
31 Oct 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/28880/2011 Of O.g.sunil v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp(C)/28880/2011 Of O.g.sunil v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933
WP(C).No. 28880 of 2011(H)
---------------------------------------
PETITIONER:
------------------
O.G. SUNIL,
13B,LINK HORIZON,
MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-11.
BY ADVS. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR
SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ
SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(APPEALS)-111, KOCHI.
3. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, RANGE-1,
C.R.BUILDINGS, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI-18.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. JOSE JOSEPH.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2002-03 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2003-04 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2004-05 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2005-06 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2007-08 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2008-09 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENTISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P8TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE YEAR 2002-03 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P9TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE YEAR 2003-04 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P10TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE YEAR 2004-053 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P11TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE YEAR 2005-06 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P12TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P13TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE YEAR 2007-08 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P14TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR THE YEAR 2008-09 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P15TRUE COPY OF THE POSTING NOTICE DATED 23/7/2010 , POSTING THE APPEALS FOR HEARING ON 17/8/2010THE APPEALS FOR HEARING ON 17/8/2010
EXHIBIT P16TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 30/9/2011 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
AMG
S. Siri Jagan, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
W.P(C) No. 28880 of 2011
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this, the 31[st] day of October, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
Against Exts.P1 to P7 assessment orders, the
petitioner has filed Exts. P8 to P14 appeals. Thoseappeals were heard by the 2[nd] respondent as early as on17.8.2010. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to pass orders on the appeals, pursuant to thehearing conducted on 17.8.2010.
2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the
respondents also.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
AMG
S. Siri Jagan, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
W.P(C) No. 28880 of 2011
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this, the 31[st] day of October, 2011.
J U D G M E N T
Against Exts.P1 to P7 assessment orders, the
petitioner has filed Exts. P8 to P14 appeals. Thoseappeals were heard by the 2[nd] respondent as early as on17.8.2010. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to pass orders on the appeals, pursuant to thehearing conducted on 17.8.2010.
2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the
respondents also.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I disposeof this writ petition with a direction to the 2[nd] respondentto pass orders on Exts. P8 to P14 appeals pursuant to thehearing conducted on 17.8.2010, as expeditiously aspossible, at any rate, within 2 months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.
Tds/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.