Wp(C)/28936/2021 Of The Karimkunnam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
15 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/28936/2021 Of The Karimkunnam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
15 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/28936/2021 Of The Karimkunnam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 15 DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943WP(C) NO. 28936 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
THE KARIMKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO. 2670
IX/73, KARIMKUNNAM SCB BUILDING,
PALA ROAD, KARIMKUNNAM P.O,
THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI -685586
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
DEENA SEBASTIAN
BY ADV S.ARUN RAJ
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERNEW DELHI-110003
NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR,
E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM,
2NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The claim of the petitioner for deduction under Section 80 P
of the Income Tax Act has been rejected by Ext.P1 assessmentorder. Against Ext.P1 assessment order passed by the 1[st]respondent, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 statutory appealbefore the 2[nd] respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is thatthe statutory appeal is not so far disposed of and the petitionerapprehends coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order.The limited prayer of the petitioner is for direction to the 2[nd]respondent to dispose of Ext.P2 appeal against Ext.P1 assessmentorder.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
3.In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shallbe a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders
on Ext.P2 appeal within a period of four months from the date ofreceipt of a certified copy of the judgment. Till such time theorders are passed, there will be a stay of all further recoveryproceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 assessment order.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
JUDGE
LU
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28936/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26.02.2021 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S.143(3A) & 143 (3B) OF THEACT FOR THE AY 2018-19
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR THE AY 2018-19.
// True Copy // PA To Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.