Wp(C)/2921/2008 Of K.g. Bindhu v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer
High Court
11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/2921/2008 Of K.g. Bindhu v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/2921/2008 Of K.g. Bindhu v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930
WP(C).No. 2921 of 2008(W)
-------------------------
PETITIONER:
------------
K.G. BINDHU,HI-TECH INDUSTRIES
THODUVATTY P.O.,PUTHENKUNNU
SULTHAN BATHERY,WAYANAD.
BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR
SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN
RESPONDENTS:
-------------
1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL
TAX OFFICER,S.BATHERY.
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)
COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE.
BY SHRI.C.K.GOVINDAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No. 2921/2008
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
P1 :COPY OF RETURN IN FORM NO.21CC DATED 24/12/2002.'
P2 :COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR2001-02 DATED 18/11/2005.
P3 :COPY OF POSTING NOTICE ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED18/04/2007.
P4 :COPY OF SHOP INSPECTION REPORT DATED 05/06/2002.
P5 :COPY OF NOTICE UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE KGST ACT DATED26/12/2007.
P6 :COPY OF APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16/01/2008.
// TRUE COPY //
jg
PA TO JUDGE.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
----------------------
WP(C) No. 2921 of 2008
------------------------------------
Dated, this the 11[th] day of April, 2008
J U D G M E N T
Since petitioner has filed appeal against revised assessment,there will be direction to 2[nd] respondent to hear the petitioner anddispose of the appeal within two months from now. Interim staygranted will continue for two months from now. Recovery,thereafter, will be based on orders in appeal.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.