Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/2921/2008 Of K.g. Bindhu v. Agrl.i...

Wp(C)/2921/2008 Of K.g. Bindhu v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer

High Court 11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/2921/2008 Of K.g. Bindhu v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/2921/2008 Of K.g. Bindhu v. Agrl.income Tax & Commercial Tax Officer, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 2921 of 2008(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.G. BINDHU,HI-TECH INDUSTRIES THODUVATTY P.O.,PUTHENKUNNU SULTHAN BATHERY,WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,S.BATHERY. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE. BY SHRI.C.K.GOVINDAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No. 2921/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :COPY OF RETURN IN FORM NO.21CC DATED 24/12/2002.' P2 :COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR2001-02 DATED 18/11/2005. P3 :COPY OF POSTING NOTICE ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED18/04/2007. P4 :COPY OF SHOP INSPECTION REPORT DATED 05/06/2002. P5 :COPY OF NOTICE UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE KGST ACT DATED26/12/2007. P6 :COPY OF APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16/01/2008. // TRUE COPY // jg PA TO JUDGE. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ---------------------- WP(C) No. 2921 of 2008 ------------------------------------ Dated, this the 11[th] day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T Since petitioner has filed appeal against revised assessment,there will be direction to 2[nd] respondent to hear the petitioner anddispose of the appeal within two months from now. Interim staygranted will continue for two months from now. Recovery,thereafter, will be based on orders in appeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan