Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/29453/2021 Of Pvs Builders & Devel...

Wp(C)/29453/2021 Of Pvs Builders & Developers v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistnat Commissioner Of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer

High Court 20 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/29453/2021 Of Pvs Builders & Developers v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistnat Commissioner Of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp(C)/29453/2021 Of Pvs Builders & Developers v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistnat Commissioner Of Income Tax/ Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 20 DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 29453 OF 2021 PETITIONER: M/S.PVS BUILDERS & DEVELOPERSGROUND FLOOR, KTC BUILDING,YMCA ROAD,KOZHIKODE, KERALA 673 001BY ADVS.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)NISHA JOHNV.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: 1ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANTCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/.NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE,NEW DELHI- 110 001.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,NEW DELHI- 110 001 OTHER PRESENT: SRI T M SREEDHARAN SR ADV-PETITIONER,SRI CHRICTOPHER ABRAHAM -SC IT DEPT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON20.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 29453 of 2021 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20[th] day of December, 2021JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment issued under the Income Tax Act 1961 relating to assessment year 2018-19, petitioner has preferred an appeal before the 2[nd]respondent, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P2. A petitionfor stay of the proceedings pursuant to the assessment orderhas also been filed as Ext.P3 before the Appellate Authority.Petitioner apprehends coercive proceedings to be effectedeven before the petition for stay is considered. Hence this writpetition. 2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinionthat this writ petition itself can be disposed of with adirection. WP(C) NO. 29453 OF 2021 3 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3stay petition, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision istaken, all coercive proceedings initiated against the petitionerpursuant to Ext.P1 shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. AJM Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29453/2021 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 22.09.2021 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19. Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL.Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION. RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS : NIL AJM //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan