Wp(C)/29643/2017 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
14 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/29643/2017 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
14 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp(C)/29643/2017 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017/23RD BHADRA, 1939
WP(C).No. 29643 of 2017 (E)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-------------
VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,NO.2522, HEAD OFFICE, PEYYADTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY, ANIL KUMAR M., S/O.MADHANAPPAN NAIR
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(4), OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 0032. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-95 003
BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 14-09-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVEREDTHE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)'EXHIBITS:
----------------------
RESPONDENT(S)'EXHIBITS:NIL
----------------------
//TRUE COPY//
P.A.TO JUDGE
nkr
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P(C) No.29643 of 2017 E
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14[th] day of September, 2017
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P3 is the order passed against the petitioner for
the assessment year 2011-12. Against this order, petitionerfiled Ext.P5 appeal, which is accompanied by Exts.P6 staypetition before the 2[nd] respondent. Appeal and stay petitionare pending before the 2[nd] respondent. In the meanwhile,coercive proceedings have been initiated. It is in this context,the writ petition has been filed.
2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that the
appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, consider and
dispose of Ext.P6 stay application within a period of two
months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
judgment and the coercive proceedings be stayed until suchorders are passed, which order shall determine the matterthereafter.
The writ petition is disposed of without anyobservation on merits and keeping in abeyance the recoverytill such time as the directions herein are complied with by
the appellate authority, whose orders shall determine thefurther steps thereafter.
jma
//true copy//
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN,
Judge
P.A to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.