Case LawHigh Court › Wp(C)/29643/2017 Of Vilappil Service Co-...

Wp(C)/29643/2017 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 14 Sep 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Wp(C)/29643/2017 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
14 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp(C)/29643/2017 Of Vilappil Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017/23RD BHADRA, 1939 WP(C).No. 29643 of 2017 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,NO.2522, HEAD OFFICE, PEYYADTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY, ANIL KUMAR M., S/O.MADHANAPPAN NAIR BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S):-------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(4), OFFICE OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 2, AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 0032. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-95 003 BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM,SC,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 14-09-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVEREDTHE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)'EXHIBITS: ---------------------- RESPONDENT(S)'EXHIBITS:NIL ---------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE nkr K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.29643 of 2017 E - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14[th] day of September, 2017 J U D G M E N T Ext.P3 is the order passed against the petitioner for the assessment year 2011-12. Against this order, petitionerfiled Ext.P5 appeal, which is accompanied by Exts.P6 staypetition before the 2[nd] respondent. Appeal and stay petitionare pending before the 2[nd] respondent. In the meanwhile,coercive proceedings have been initiated. It is in this context,the writ petition has been filed. 2. In the above circumstances, it is directed that the appellate authority, the 2[nd] respondent herein, consider and dispose of Ext.P6 stay application within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment and the coercive proceedings be stayed until suchorders are passed, which order shall determine the matterthereafter. The writ petition is disposed of without anyobservation on merits and keeping in abeyance the recoverytill such time as the directions herein are complied with by the appellate authority, whose orders shall determine thefurther steps thereafter. jma //true copy// Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge P.A to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan