Wp(C)/29690/2014 Of K.i.sunny v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/20TH KARTHIKA, 1936 WP(C).No. 29690 of 2014 (I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ K.I.SUNNY, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.LATE K.C.ITTOOP, KUTTAMKULAM HOUSE, ANNA VILLA, KURIJIKKAL LANE, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN: 680 003. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2), THRISSUR - 680 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) V, OFFICE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) V KOCHI - 682 018. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-11-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29690 of 2014 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 24/2/2014.RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 24/2/2014. EXHIBIT P2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE E APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITOINER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDNET DATED 25/3/2014.BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDNET DATED 25/3/2014. EXHIBIT P3: THE TRUE COPY OF DIRECTION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH EXT.P2BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH EXT.P2 EXHIBIT P4: THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 27/03/2014 ISSUED BY STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, THRISSUR MAIN BRANCH.STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, THRISSUR MAIN BRANCH. EXHIBIT P5: THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 24/6/2014 ISSUED BY STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, THRISSUR MAIN BRANCH.BANK OF TRAVANCORE, THRISSUR MAIN BRANCH. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: --------------------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.-----------------------------------W.P(C). No. 29690 of 2014 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11[th] day of November, 2014 J U D G M E N T Being aggrieved of Ext.P1 assessment order passed by the firstrespondent, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal, along withExt.P3 petition for direction, not to proceed with recovery proceedings,which are pending consideration before the second respondent. Thegrievance of the petitioner is that, without any regard to the pendencyof the above proceedings, the respondents are proceeding with suchsteps, which hence is sought to be intercepted by this Court. 2.Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the secondrespondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders onExt.P3, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at anyrate, within 'one month' from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. Coercive proceedings, if any, shall be kept in abeyance tillsuch time. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with acopy of this writ petition before the second respondent for furthersteps. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.